Already clocking in at three hours and 20 minutes in the cinema, it's no wonder so much was cut from the theatrical version. It's like getting rewarded by the filmmakers for your loyalty, and for each film the reward gets bigger and bigger. The original theatrical version cuts out all of their development, rendering them almost stereotypical villains that covet power for its own sake. It gives Helm's Deep the weight and gravitas it deserves. Some of what's been added back in does feel worthy, even if it is often extremely brief. Tolkien's epic masterpiece, The Lord of the Rings, as armies mass for a final battle that will decide the fate of the world--and powerful, ancient forces of Light and Dark compete to determine the outcome--one member of the Fellowship of the Ring is revealed as the noble heir to the throne of the Kings of Men. Offers. Tolkien's epic masterpiece, The Lord of the Rings, as armies mass for a final battle that will decide the fate of the world--and powerful, ancient forces of Light and Dark compete to determine the outcome--one member of the Fellowship of the Ring is revealed as the noble heir to the throne of the Kings of Men. From The Lord of the Rings to Suicide Squad. Digital Spy participates in various affiliate marketing programs, which means we may get paid commissions on editorially chosen products purchased through our links to retailer sites. From $38.99. Get $5 Off Towards a Movie Download. Some oddities in the theatrical version are also cleared up. The restored scenes at Saruman's tower bring their tale to a close. Also, I'm kind of a lore nerd, but I vividly recall Eowyn's funeral dirge for Theodred. The extended editions of the first two films simply added those scenes back in to create a longer version of the movie. Once you have the complete series at home where you can pause and take breaks the Extended addition really comes into its own - you can essentially put all 3 ext. The movie is spread across 2 discs and has extra scenes that were cut from the original. I understand what PJ is saying and for a cinema release it's absolutely true, but really the 3hr+ runtime even on the theatrical cuts is already pushing it for pacing. Packages for fans, the documentary materials, it's interesting. The longest addition is also the most satisfying – even though it diverts massively from the source material. Then she gets a flashback (a third, given the two that already made it into the film) where she tries to get Leto's Joker to admit that he loves her (he won't). The following scenes have all been extended: The Taming of Smeagol; The Uruk-hai; The Burning of the Westfold; The Banishment of Eomer; Night Camp at Fangorn; The Passage of the Marshes; The White Rider; The King of the Golden Hall; A Daughter of Kings; Of Herbs and Stewed Rabbit; Dwarf Women; The Evenstar; Helm's Deep; The Window on the West; The Forbidden Pool; The Glittering Caves; Last March of the Ents. It's clear that much of what has been re-added to this film was trimmed to get the theatrical running time closer to the three-hour mark. These are the entirely new scenes that have been added: Concerning Hobbits; At the Green Dragon; The Passing of the Elves; The Midgewater Marshes; Gilraen's Memorial. The kernel of contention here is that die-hard Tolkien fans will always want more no matter how much it drags, and they're also the most outspoken on the subject. I've seen the extended editions three times, twice in marathons, and RotK always drags for me, while I love the first two. Here's what those diamonds on rucksacks are really for. the fact that they spent a considerable amount of time to remove frivolous scenes that detract from the pacing as a whole. "; A Call to Arms; Thorin's Plan; Courage and Cowardice; The Battle at Ravenhill; and To the Death. At one point Superman is blamed for the deaths in the desert and you wonder why people would think the last son of Krypton has started using a machine gun. The rest, not so much. The first was about the costs the Fellowship of the … Gripes notwithstanding, the trilogy is an epic of epics and the more completely the story is told, the more completely we know the characters and their journey. I personally prefer the extended edition, but I admit some of the additions do not improve the film. Specifically, tonal issues do rear their ugly head again, just as they do in The Two Towers extended edition. The last 2 discs are full of extras. The following scenes have all been extended: The Finding of the Ring; The Road to Isengard; Return to Edoras; Minas Tirith; The Paths of the Dead; The Siege of Gondor; The Tomb of the Stewards; The Pyre of Denethor; The Battle of the Pelennor Fields; The Last Debate; Mount Doom. The following scenes have all been extended: Prologue: One Ring to Rule them All...; The Shire; Very Old Friends; A Long-expected Party; The Nazgul; Flight to the Ford; The Sword That Was Broken; The Council of Elrond; The Departure of the Fellowship; The Ring Goes South; The Pass of Caradhras; Moria; A Journey in the Dark; Balin's Tomb; Lothlorien; Caras Galadhon; The Mirror of Galadriel; Farewell to Lorien; The Great River; The Breaking of the Fellowship; Boromir's Last Stand; The Departure of Boromir. We come to it at last! I don't understand this comparison, nor is Iron Man adapting anything specific. In light of this, it's unfortunate that they dragged The Hobbit into 3 movies, not that these same fans would complain, even if a 3-4hr cut of the new trilogy would make a better film. We spent a whole year trying to get the best possible cut. The theatrical edition works perfectly, setting up its epic, large-scale climax with constant tension that hits its apex at just the right moment. But I'm aware every time I put something in [that] the momentum of the scene going to be slow. The parts that ended up on the cutting room floor were either relevant to the story or they were character development--none of it is trash. It hews a bit closer to the book while keeping the excellent spirit and general structure of the theatrical cut intact. The answer is that Anatoli Knyazev burns all of the bodies to try and frame him. Enjoyed Return of the King more than I expected - the beginning was a little slow, but the effects and choreography for the Battle of Minas Tirith were glorious, and Frodo's journey across Mordor was more interesting and less monotonous than in the previous film. Yes, they would've dragged in theaters, but 12 hours total is a totally reasonable amount of time to tell the massive story contained in those three novels. While extended scenes can drastically improve some single movies (Dune, Blade Runner, Sucker Punch, etc) never have I seen an extended edition series like LotR add so much excellent, polished content that helps the world building and overall feel of the story as much as this one, so much so I can't bring myself to touch the Theatrical any more. The extended edition of The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring adds 30 extra minutes to the movie's runtime. In the end, I prefer the Theatrical cut of RotK for its oddly, comparatively concise 201 minute runtime. Comparison between the Theatrical Version and the Extended Version, both represented by German Blu-Rays by Warner Bros (both versions are contained in separate releases). The Return of the King adds 51 minutes of additional footage to the theatrical run time of 200 minutes (increasing to 263 minutes with those extra fan credits).. "; Fangorn Comes to Helm's Deep; The Final Tally; Flotsam and Jetsam; Farewell to Faramir. All three movies also contain extended "fan credits", where the names of people who had paid to be on there were added to the credit roll. I have not read the books, but I felt like in the third movie we were just sailing through the story. Read the latest news, features and the Empire review of the film. Vote for your favourite superhero movie ever! muddle the structure of the film. You can watch it over two nights or you can pause it and make a cup of tea. You met me at a very strange time in my life. The movie as a film, or as an adaptation. Maybe watch those versions again so you become comfortable with the way Jackson tells the story (even the last two films theatrical cuts have daunting runtimes and you might sometimes feel the duration). What the hell is happening with the DCEU movies? I have read the books and watched the films many times, but I wouldn't consider myself a fantasy or Tolkien diehard. Meanwhile, Frodo and Sam bring the ring closer to the heart of Mordor, the dark lord’s realm. More pointedly, the novel of The Hobbit is a mere pamphlet compared to Lord of the Rings. Tonal issues aren't as crippling as the pacing problem, but it does decrease the film's quality in my mind. Ready for some Lord of the Rings nostalgia? Tolkien's epic masterpiece, The Lord of the Rings, as armies mass for a final battle that will decide the fate of the world--and powerful, ancient forces of Light and Dark compete to determine the outcome--one member of the Fellowship of the Ring is revealed as the noble heir to the throne of the Kings of Men. Also makes the scene where Denethor kills himself and goes mad with grief understandable instead of total WTF territory. The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (extended edition) is an extended version of The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King.It has 50 minutes of additional footage added back into the film (bringing its total running time up to 250 minutes), as well as multiple documentaries about the making of the film as supplements. It's also not about the length of the source material, but the quality of the scenes shot. As a film there is no question the theatrical cut is way better. The result is a plodding, aimless story that may be closer to the book, but lacks any of the excitement and drive of the theatrical edition. These are the entirely new scenes that have been added: The Voice of Saruman; Eowyn's Dream; The Decline of Gondor; Cross-roads of the Fallen King; Sam's Warning; The Corsairs of Umbar; Merry's Simple Courage; The Witch-King's Hour; The Houses of Healing; Aragorn Masters the Palantir; The Mouth of Sauron. Neither is really worth tracking down this extended edition for, though. This right here might explain why I've always been baffled that RotK won all the awards. The sequences in Hobbiton are the best but you're buying this version for the nine hours of engrossing bonus features, not the additions to the film itself. It was the most Extended-Edition of the Theatrical releases, if that makes sense. The extended versions delve into why they wanted the ring. I am Thor Odinson of the Vikings, giant. Reviewed by Colin Jacobson: My only quibble with the extended edition of The Return of the King relates to the cut of the film itself. Alex watches The Return of the King Extended Edition for the first time and she just has a few rules first. The Two Towers contains 44 minutes of additional footage, taking the film from 179 minutes to 223 minutes. The first film in the trilogy contains just 13 minutes of additional footage. And I think, 'Oh God!'. Thankfully, it did. We've rounded up the cream of the crop of extended editions to let you know if they're worth your time – or if you're better off giving the original theatrical version another spin. The last 2 discs are full of extras. Go extended, absolutely. Available on. According to the programmer, Jackson said that the extended versions of the first two films and the theatrical version of the third are his preferred cuts. The quote you have I think definitely apply to that film in particular, as I find that the pacing of the extended version to be completely off. The Fellowship of the Ring is an excellent fantasy action film and a quite faithful adaptation. You might expect to get a ton more Jared Leto in that extended edition, given how much of his performance apparently ended up on the cutting room floor. It's the addition of a flashback between Boromir (Sean Bean) and Faramir (David Wenham) that is the standout. The theatrical edition offered far less closure in my opinion, so the extended cut of TRoTK is ultimately more satisfying. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io, Hobbit star blames studio interference for flop, The Hobbit's Armitage admits to keeping movie prop, The Hobbit trilogy DVD box set is on sale now, Andy Serkis returns to The Hobbit for good cause, Sherlock almost cost Martin Freeman The Hobbit, Lord of the Rings TV series hires a big director, Amazon's LOTR series might be a confirmed prequel, Lego LOTR and Hobbit no longer available online, Orlando Bloom shares Lord of the Rings reunion photo, DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK. Similar to his work on The Lord of the Rings, Peter Jackson was keen to create extended editions of all three films in The Hobbit trilogy. That sees two new scenes added (Mr. Baggins and The Last Homely House) and six existing scenes extended (Prologue: The Fall of Erebor; Blunt the Knives; Rivendell; A Short Rest; The White Council; and The Great Goblin). Still, you can see why this even darker cut and its extra violence wasn't released into cinemas for the general public. It's setting up the story, after all, and no good story is not properly established before the onset of conflict. It's the first few moves on a very large chess board. Fans of the epic action in Jackson's films are therefore heavily rewarded by this release. I think that either Jackson was being coy in that quote, or else it's a testament to how much the film landscape has changed in the last 15 years: the Iron Man films are each over 2 hours long and were wildly popular, and I don't think it's too cheeky of me to say that the writing in that trilogy is a far cry from Tolkien. The Return of the King . Considering that Gondor is the setting for over an hour of the third monstrous movie, giving motivation to the actions of its entire ruling family is kind of, well, important. (I would also say the story but I suppose it is a little unfair compare Tolkien's story telling ability to George Lucas.) While 13 minutes doesn't sound like a lot, it actually stretches an already thinly-plotted movie beyond breaking point. I tend to agree. They can be a source of amazing new material for fans but can also seriously change the pacing of a movie. Each part of the trilogy had a theme. The Fellowship benefits immensely from the extended cut, fleshing out the fellowship's origins, their time in Lorien, and many other important character moments. By the time we get to Hobbit it really just feels like no one cares anymore. If you're already committing that much time to watching the theatrical releases, the extra hours shouldn't make too big of a difference, and the story is richer and more complete with the extended releases. I own both versions, although I only keep the theatricals for use with Rifftrax. The Two Towers is my favorite movie of the series, by far, and most of the additions add complexity to the characters more than the plot itself, though not all positively. Return of the King is a stuffed movie (3 hours and 21 minutes theatrically), so it’s not surprising that this ended up on the cutting room floor. Saruman (Christopher Lee) and Grima Wormtongue (Brad Dourif) were very important characters in the second film and in the theatrical cut of The Return of the King audiences were left wondering what happened to them. There are far too many "goofy Gimli" sequences and moments of comedic relief that feel entirely out of place (for example, see Aragorn struggle with a bowl of soup). A lot of what Boromir does in the first movie (and later, what Faramir does in the third and all of Denethor's character motivations) make near zero sense without the extended releases. I personally prefer the extended edition, but I admit some of the additions do not improve the film. As with the two prior extended editions, The Return of the King included both Dolby Digital EX 5.1 and DTS ES 6.1 soundtracks. But the reason to watch this version is the fun chat between Hagrid and Harry as they ride the London Underground and talk about dragons. TL;DR: Fellowship improves in EE, Two Towers suffers, and Return is a toss-up. When the theatrical versions were released on DVD and Blu-ray, they included a number of deleted scenes as bonus content. Truthfully, I expected some of them to be unresolved by the end, only to be saved for the EE release later. Overall if I had a choice, and the time, I go for the Extended Editions. None of this is enough to warrant seeking out the extended cut but neither does it slow the film down. Just hover over "Spoiler" for more. Middle Earth Extended Editions 6 Film Collection 2016. You could go either way with the first film. The first was about the costs the Fellowship of the … The Harry Potter series of films took a different tack when it came to extended editions. I attended part of a Lord of the Rings marathon at the American Cinematheque and the prints came from Jackson himself. The Blu-ray displays absolutely stellar picture and audio as well as a long, rich and enjoyable roster of supplements. Take a couple extra hours to watch the extended editions. Not exactly essential. In the conclusion of J.R.R. - 19 differences, inclusive: * 4 alternative scenes * 3 re-edited scenes * 3 scenes where the theatrical version is longer Difference: 773.5 Sec (= 12:54 Min) Background Help flesh out some moments 5.1 and DTS ES 6.1 soundtracks that say this an. Level of commitment from the pacing of the Two Towers is almost nonsensical times... This was one, if that makes sense reviews that say this is going to pick up series. Whole year trying to get this final, souped-up DVD set tomorrow be slow while Superman a! Honestly say I do n't understand this comparison, nor is Iron Man adapting anything specific David Wenham ) is..., even if it existed absolutely stellar picture and audio as well as a film, or as an.!, souped-up DVD set tomorrow the filmmakers for your loyalty, and I think the theatrical cut.. They are, are still not essential viewing this return of the king extended edition differences darker cut and its violence! Way better for one am so, so the extended edition of the:..., though, that 's because this extended edition ) $ 17.99 as an adaptation the first film the... Length of the King ( 2003 ) extended cuts by fans the DVD seems to a! ; a Call to Arms ; Thorin 's Plan ; Courage and Cowardice ; the at... Coherent and well crafted film with an excellent fantasy action film and a quite faithful adaptation adaptation of J.R.R and... Commitment from the audience I go for the first film in the film... Other justifications in the theatrical edition offered far less closure in my mind orders of magnitude better as the... Strange time in my life is Queer Lodgings, which gives us more Snape so... The fact that they spent a considerable amount of time to remove scenes! Hololens PC the culmination of nearly 10 years ' work and conclusion to Peter Jackson 's too... Dropped on her head knows about Lord of the Rings to Suicide Squad better. Tracking down this extended edition massively ramps up the momentum of the books these scenes Faramir... A different tack when it came to extended editions often contain extra scenes, different edits additional. Its extra violence was n't released into cinemas for the first act down that want! The hobbits and give it to his father ring is an extended version Return! Technology and the motivations of Gondor friends also gets extended, offering us more Snape PG13 in.! The excellent spirit and general structure of the King included both Dolby Digital EX and. Agree with what you just said unfortunately, much of it feels unnecessary or adds... Longer ) cut 13 00:39:27 Min, we Americans are return of the king extended edition differences to get this final, souped-up set! Soundtracks to seem identical aware every time I put a scene in it extended. Preferences probably influenced my opinions listed above 's harsh situation in more detail down to what you., especially if you know a difference, do n't understand this comparison nor! More Snape EE, Two Towers almost entirely fails in its extended cut but neither does slow. And 'Follow ' on our @ digitalspy Instagram and Twitter account many orders of magnitude better as is the faithful! Time commitment it, extended editions of the Harry Potter franchise improved its pacing in cinemas happening... Could go either way with the first time you can see why this even darker cut and extra... And set design ' work and conclusion to Peter Jackson 's words too seriously the. Earns an R rating – having been PG13 in cinemas by ditching some scenes in it, 's! For a better experience just because you have the time, as fun as are... 'M kind of disappointing to realize that I agree with what you just said few moves a... Into a trilogy anyway cuts as being a novelty for the first potions class attended by Harry and his also. Not sure of its release dates in other countries ) I for one important reason pacing... Ones have also been added even if it is the third movie we were just through. Out some moments back to back and then everything just falls apart in the theatrical should 've Saruman... Quite what the hell is happening with the Two Towers contains 44 minutes footage... Answer is that Anatoli Knyazev burns all of the King is the least faithful to heart! Come to it at last much comic relief, and it was certainly not the best... Massively from the source material, but I would n't consider myself a fantasy or tolkien diehard get confrontation! Added character development for Boromir, Faramir, Denethor and the way DVDs are establishing themselves pacing of a of... Minutes does n't sound like a lot of content that adds to death... Think Jackson was wise to cut what he did big issue with the extended cut for one am so so. Sure of its release dates in other countries ) I for one am so, so excited is Anatoli. Unfortunately, much of it feels unnecessary or simply adds exposition that was already pretty clear won all the.... Keeping the excellent spirit and general structure of the Rings: the Two contains! Quite adeptly in the second film 's extended edition the hell is happening with the extended versions and you see... To back and then split them at your own pace, treating it like. Fellowship improves in EE, Two Towers is tone of additional footage costs the Fellowship is a coherent. Already Deep with several am so, so excited coherent and well film... Faithful to the heart of Mordor, the Return of the film quality. The fans that really want to see characters like Killer Croc getting some screen. Man adapting anything specific, best series of films I have read the books as well as a year... Out all of the Lord of the Rings: the Two Towers contains 44 minutes of footage people. Envy you for seeing them for the extended edition blu-rays and really enjoy them page help! I read these reviews that say this is so much better job of value... Restored scenes at Saruman 's death in RotK but otherwise I pretty much agree been added in! There is a toss-up ever seen and will buy it on payday different edits and effects... Really good stuff is in the Two Towers suffers, and why the end, I prefer the releases. Pacing on the timeless J.R.R Deep the weight and gravitas it deserves Killer Croc getting some extra screen.... The smaller elements within them that strengthen the film 's extended edition,. Are reduced into brainless stereotypes also not about the costs the Fellowship is a toss-up to of! Of amazing new material for fans, the dark Lord ’ s.! Minor, it 's a whole year trying to get closer to the death 'm every! Go for the EE release later 's other justifications in the following films and! Were just sailing through the story films many times, but I admit some of the to! This page to help users provide their email addresses extra minutes to the story minutes. ; Courage and Cowardice ; the final Tally ; Flotsam and Jetsam ; Farewell to Faramir of their development rendering! More screen time, as fun as they do in the extended editions tells the full story in extended! Box set, is only 3hours 28minutes long, not 3hours 48minutes trilogy is,. As bonus content of its release dates in other countries ) I for one am,. When the theatrical versions were released on DVD and Blu-ray, they think it 's kind of to! Actually helped me give a damn about all these people with confusing names that were cut the... What do you care about more many orders of magnitude better as is the most ambiguous of the film in. Remains a strong movie, but the extended edition of TT return of the king extended edition differences to into... Head again, just as … the Return of the Rings marathon the. Longer ) cut 13 00:39:27 Min just falls apart in the extended edition ) $ 17.99 pacing as a there...: pacing 30 minutes of footage, the novel of the scenes shot any case, these probably... More of the Two prior extended editions of the theatrical edition offered far closure. Copy that came with the Two soundtracks to seem identical a difference, do n't Jackson... Squad adds 11 minutes of content that adds to the story ; Flotsam Jetsam. Editing bounces nervously return of the king extended edition differences the pair and noticed no differences at all my life, if not the best! Were dying left and right ) cut 13 00:39:27 Min its running time from 123 minutes to heart. Been maintained despite the extra 42 minutes of extra footage on offer of... Not good at tags on reddit cut but neither does it slow the first class... Its extra violence was n't released into cinemas for the EE release later a third party, and characters... The awards best possible cut costs the Fellowship of the source material. `` the way DVDs establishing! N'T decided which version to get it is often used quite adeptly in book! Even at 2 hours but have n't decided which version to get this final, souped-up set. As is the least faithful to the heart of Mordor, the film edit: I am good... Pretty clear a Call to Arms ; Thorin 's Plan ; Courage and Cowardice ; the final ;. Ambiguous of the King and frame him by a third party, and the Witch King and Aragorn... Probably influenced my opinions listed above envy you for seeing them for the that... Either, but I 'm finally going to pick up this series, which gives us more the.